{"id":7868,"date":"2015-01-08T12:46:46","date_gmt":"2015-01-08T11:46:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/euroalter.local\/?p=7868"},"modified":"2020-03-03T12:09:50","modified_gmt":"2020-03-03T11:09:50","slug":"ulrich-beck-the-necessity-of-a-cosmopolitan-outlook","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/fr\/ulrich-beck-the-necessity-of-a-cosmopolitan-outlook\/","title":{"rendered":"Ulrich Beck: The necessity of a cosmopolitan outlook"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ulrich Beck died on the 1st January 2015. As a tribute to his cosmopolitan thinking and utopianism for Europe, we here republish an interview he gave to European Alternatives in 2010, which seems all the more pertinent today with the rise of anti-immigrant sentiment in Germany, an the ongoing evolutions of the euro-crisis.<\/em><\/p>\n

\"UB\"<\/a>In this interview Ulrich Beck claims the necessity for an inclusive, cosmopolitan outlook capable of breaking \u201cwith the seductive insularity of national consciousness\u201d and to recognize the productiveness of the post-national era\u2019s paradoxical principle: the principle of self-empowerment through self-deprivation of power, according to which \u201cnational sovereignty does not make cooperation possible; rather, it is transnational cooperation that makes national sovereignty possible\u201d.<\/p>\n

Giuliano Battiston: I would like to begin from globalization, \u201cthe most widely used – and misused \u2013 keyword in disputes of recent as well as coming years; but [..] also one of the most rarely defined, the most nebulous and misunderstood, as well as the most politically effective\u201d, as you write in What is Globalization?<\/em> Would you explain what you mean when you state, in\u00a0Conversations with Ulrich Beck<\/em>, that \u201cglobalization should be chiefly conceived of as globalization from within, as internalized globalization\u201d? And why according to your perspective is it important to contest the equation between the depoliticizing but highly political spell of globalism \u2013 the economic monodimensional interpretation of it – and the multidimensionality of globalization?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ulrich Beck:<\/strong> Until some years ago I used to speak about globalization from within or internalized globalization, but then I switched to cosmopolitization (not cosmopolitanism). In order to explain what I mean by that, let\u2019s just pick up a few examples. In a German middle-class town with twenty thousand inhabitants, in basic schools you find children from a background of twenty languages. It\u2019s amazing and it\u2019s happening, but it has not been internalized. People still think there is and that we need just a normal educational system: the teachers are left alone, and they have to do their job without having being educated for this new situation.\u00a0While at the political level we are talking, like in Italy, about the possibility\u00a0(somebody would say the necessity) of excluding foreigners. But this is not talking about reality; the reality is that in the inside all kind of globalization happens.<\/p>\n

And the same if you look at the family structures, in European countries but\u00a0in many other non-European countries as well, where bi-national families are increasing. While Asian families, for example, know how to use this globalization from within as a resource for organizing family life beyond borders, planning transnationalized structures for family networks. So far we just look at the family as a national face-to-face relationship, but now we see it is going to be cosmopolitanized in many ways. And you can take all other issues, for example work-education, where there is a new split between those who are able or competent and have resources to interact beyond borders and those who don\u2019t have those resources and feel frightened by competition from other countries. The first kind react \u201copenly\u201d and the second with nationalism, but both are reacting to what I would say is a cosmopolitization of work. Those are elements of globalization from within.<\/p>\n

Until now, the consolation of the national view was about excluding the national others, thinking that everything which is relevant for politics is only within the national context. But now we are living in a situation where this does not work anymore \u2013 like it nor not, the nationally excluded other is part of our own living, working and family condition. This is what I mean by cosmopolitization. This is why I don\u2019t talk only about globalization from within but of cosmopolitization, which means that the other is in us.<\/p>\n

As for what regards the economic dimension of globalization, I think the term globalization \u2013 as it is commonly used – is not really giving meaning to the important subject we are involved in. And this is the human condition of un-excludability; it means you cannot exclude the nationally constructed\u00a0other anymore. Politically, as sociologically, this is the issue we are confronted with, and this has a lot of very different meanings. One of them\u00a0is what I would call now the globalization of strangeness. People suddenly\u00a0experience themselves living in a very strange world and being confronted\u00a0with all kind of strangeness. They don\u2019t recognize anymore the city they are living in, maybe even the street because of all kind of globalizations happening in those areas; people feel to have no place in this new context, and feel frightened by this new situation of un-excludability of the strange-other. On the other hand, there\u2019s an enlightenment function, as people are opening up, realizing they necessarily have to deal with each other in order to find solutions to the big problems. So, both things are happening, in an ambivalent dynamic.<\/p>\n

GB<\/strong>: One of the main thematic frameworks of your research is the concept\u00a0of world risk society, a concept that, as you write in World at Risk<\/em>, according to some scholars \u201cencourages a kind of neo-Splengerism and hinders political action\u201d. Precisely the opposite is the case, you argue, because \u201cas world risk society, society becomes reflexive\u201d, and because, as for the concept of unexcludability, \u201crisk conflicts do indeed have an enlightening function. They destabilize the existing order but can also be seen as a vital step towards the construction of new institutions\u201d. Would you explain what you mean saying that \u201cglobal risks unexpectedly liberate a world-historical \u2018cosmopolitan moment\u2019\u201d?<\/strong><\/p>\n

UB:<\/strong> I believe that global risks are producing global reflexivity of risks, and\u00a0that talking about risk and reflecting upon risk on a global scale is the same process. Therefore risk is a basic condition of reflexive modernization, because suddenly the basic institutions and principles of modernity are being questioned: who would have believed that the basic principles of market economy could be questioned? But it happened; maybe they already forgot about it, but still, for a moment, it happened, and it happened because of the global reflexivity of risks. I believe this is what the enlightenment function of risk means: there\u2019s a specific moment,\u00a0there\u2019s a time, a window of opportunity; I don\u2019t know for how long it lasts, it depends on the staging of the issue, on all kind of conditions, but suddenly people move, and institutions who nobody thought could be questioned become part of the political debate, and new kind of power relations are constructed and so on. And suddenly the powerless became to some extent powerful. We saw this kind of process in Copenhagen, where the countries that are mostly affected by climate change and don\u2019t have a chance to actually react and respond to it, suddenly got a voice, and not only a voice. Thanks to this process of reflexivity, in Copenhagen, for the first time, those \u201cunderdevelopment\u201d countries themselves realized the situation: they do have an element of power, because everybody knows that if they are not included then all idea of consensus on future strategy would collapse, and we would face a fragmentation of the world (what we are experienced\u00a0to some extent now). So, this is what I mean: the basic relations of\u00a0power, institutional structures, and social inequality become part of the public reflectivity in different counties. And on a world level as well.<\/p>\n

GB: As regarding Copenhagen: since your first book, you have always paid attention to the environmental crises. In Conversation with Ulrich Beck<\/em> for instance you state that \u201cthe first modernity rests on a clear distinction between society and nature. Nature is conceived as the \u2018outside\u201d of society, and as a functionally infinite resource and sink\u201d. Would you say that the activists for climate justice in Copenhagen have shown a global consciousness that we should not consider \u201cproblems of the environment\u00a0in the sense of the surrounding world (Umwelt), but as problems affecting\u00a0the inner world (Innenwelt) of society\u201d (World at Risk)? And that it is finally\u00a0emerging what you have called \u201ca utopian ecological democracy\u201d, \u201cwhich\u00a0would open our eyes and our institutions to the immaturity of the first industrial civilization and the dangers it posed to itself\u201d (What is Globalization)?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

UB: This is my position: if you look at the environment as environment, you\u00a0are not only missing the point of the environmental movement, but you are\u00a0threatening your own political capacity to find any answer. Only if you see\u00a0there is a combination between nature and society, you can have a political answer to it; that\u2019s why I believe that even environment as a concept is misleading sociology and politics. Whether there is going to be an ecological democracy, that is still an open question, of course.\u00a0I really like the idea of Bruno Latour, who is talking about the Parliament of\u00a0things, with the ideas that all kind of things are part of the networks we are\u00a0all involved in and they must have their voices in the public domain. He probably would say climate change is a way of articulating the voice of things and animals and people in this combination.\u00a0This is an interesting idea, but so far you don\u2019t see much material bases for this kind of participation. In fact, even the opposite is coming up. If you look at climate scientists who are very much engaged in this climate issue, they think something has to be done now, quite urgently, otherwise there\u2019s no answer anymore. So, they are now more and more questioning democracy, saying we need a kind of technocratic political system. I must confess\u00a0I am a bit skeptical about this technocratic reaction. From the beginning of\u00a0my thinking I know that the danger and the perception of danger produce this kind of technocratic response. That\u2019s why I think it is important to show how democracy is the condition for finding solutions even to climate change. But this is not easy, as all the technocratic visions which are now coming up underestimate that they do need consensus.\u00a0However, without democracy there would be no consciousness about the\u00a0environmental problem; this did not come up because of scientists or governments; it came up because civil society movements had the chance to\u00a0raise their voice in the public. It came up under democratic conditions. There are no solutions without a consensus, and the consensus will only be constructed by democratic institutions.<\/p>\n

GB:<\/strong> Let\u2019s go back to your concept of cosmopolitanism. In Power in the Global Age<\/em>, you introduce an extremely interesting idea, saying that the Enlightenment concept of cosmopolitanism, freed from its origins in imperial universalism, could contribute to \u201cthe developments\u00a0of politics towards what we might call a \u2018cosmopolitan state\u2019\u201d. Would you say something more about your idea of an \u201can organizational model of deterritorialized democracy\u201d?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

UB:<\/strong> I think that the European Union could be a model, at least to some extent. The fact is that there are so many misunderstandings about the European Union. In my view, because of a \u201cnation-state understanding\u201d of modernity, even social scientists largely don\u2019t understand what they talk about when they analyze the European Union. Indeed, in a nation-state perspective there can be only either a big nation (a European nation, or a federal State, or a super-State), or there can be no Europe, and only national States. So, there is an either\/or situation between national States and the European stage.\u00a0I believe this is the biggest problem in the self-understanding in Europe. At\u00a0the same time, we have to understand that, for example, the European bureaucracy, which is a widespread negative image of Europe, is actually very small, smaller than the bureaucracy of Berlin, or London, or Paris, even if not as well-organized. In any case, the model of the European Union is that the laws and the norms which European institutions pass are being implemented by the nation-state: it\u2019s a combination of national sovereignty and cooperation between nation-states, and it is something different from the functioning of a big nation. This cooperation means that there is no decrease in sovereignty, but shift and increase of sovereignty on the\u00a0national level as well. Let me give you an example: maybe you remember the Polish president who, a few years ago, was very much opposed to Europe, and he was making all kinds of objections.\u00a0If we consider his situation, we find out that he was empowered as a member of the European Union to be powerful against the European Union. If Poland would not be a member of European Union, nobody would care about what its president says. So, only the European Union empowers all kind of States, even the smaller ones, with a combined sovereignty\u00a0that is even stronger than if they were not part of European Union.\u00a0I think the European Union is something which goes in the direction of the\u00a0cosmopolitization of the States, which means that there has to be a cooperation. This is \u2013 as we see in Europe \u2013 quite complicated, because people misunderstand their own national identity, their own national sovereignty. Now this is the case with Greece: is Greece part of Germany? Is Germany part of Greece? Nobody believes it, but this is the case because both are part of Europe; there\u2019s no Greece and Germany as different\u00a0countries, there\u2019s a Europeanized Greece and a Europeanized Germany.\u00a0And because that\u2019s the case, what happened in Greece is very important to\u00a0Germany and to all other European countries. The European Union is a\u00a0political architecture that goes in the direction of the cosmopolitization of\u00a0States, and it is complicated because the national States don\u2019t disappear, but\u00a0have to learn to combine and interact with each other.<\/p>\n

GB: Despite the cosmopolitization of States, most of the scholars \u2013 not to\u00a0speak of politicians \u2013 are still inclined to adopt what you call \u201cmethodological nationalism\u201d, the insistence that the meta-game of global politics is and always will be a national game. You have written that this nationalism functions as an \u201cunrecognized mental block\u201d, thanks to which \u201cmany writers see the global age as spelling the end of the national state and therefore of democracy\u201d. Instead, you argue that \u201cthe ideas of statehood and state sovereignty have not become superfluous\u201d, but must \u201cbe redefined and extended in a cosmopolitan direction\u201d (Cosmopolitan\u00a0Vision<\/em>). Would you explain what you mean when you state that, in order to\u00a0avoid the national trap, it is necessary to distinguish \u201cbetween autonomy and sovereignty\u201d?<\/strong><\/p>\n

UB:<\/strong> This distinction is really crucial, because you can lose autonomy by for\u00a0example being part of the European Union, or being dependent on let\u2019s say\u00a0the International Monetary Fund, but at the same time, under specific conditions, in loosing your autonomy you can increase your sovereignty. For instance, you could solve problems of migration on a transnational level, you can solve problems related to the transnational and cosmopolitan criminal networks, which know how to exploit differences of legal systems like transnational corporations do, and use these differences in order to increase the power of their criminal structure. So, in pooling the sovereignty by cooperation between different States, you can produce solutions to those problems, while on the national level we have all kind of discussions which actually cannot solve any problem. That\u2019s why, regardless of whoever gets elected, after one or two years we find out that they are not really able to solve the problems. The different contradictions on the national level arise because at that level you don\u2019t have the adequate resources anymore. In this sense, the idea of sovereignty is getting fictitious. It is not a real political practice anymore; rather, it is just in the heads of the people. Therefore, a new combination and new cooperation is necessary. One of the basic issues is, again, climate change, but you can pick the one you prefer.<\/p>\n

For example, everybody is discussing the current crisis of the Euro, and it\u2019s\u00a0not very difficult to say that if we stick to the national perspective for the first time there\u2019s going to be a real crisis of the Euro, because we don\u2019t have any European answer to the Europeanized financial system. So, again the nations seem to be sovereign but they are not able to handle these problems which are really part of a more articulated political system, and this is always the same. Under specific conditions, loosing autonomy can mean pooling sovereignty, and this pooling of sovereignty in turns produces an increase in sovereignty to a level capable of solving all those problems that are not national anymore. In other words, it is the paradoxical principle I write about in World at Risk: national sovereignty does not make cooperation possible; rather, it is transnational cooperation that makes that makes national sovereignty possible.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ulrich Beck died on the 1st January 2015. As a tribute to his cosmopolitan thinking and utopianism for Europe, we here republish an interview he…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":7869,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7868","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-transnational-democracy"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nUlrich Beck: The necessity of a cosmopolitan outlook - European Alternatives<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/ulrich-beck-the-necessity-of-a-cosmopolitan-outlook\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ulrich Beck: The necessity of a cosmopolitan outlook - European Alternatives\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Ulrich Beck died on the 1st January 2015. As a tribute to his cosmopolitan thinking and utopianism for Europe, we here republish an interview he…\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/ulrich-beck-the-necessity-of-a-cosmopolitan-outlook\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"European Alternatives\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-01-08T11:46:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-03-03T11:09:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Marta Cillero\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Marta Cillero\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"14 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/ulrich-beck-the-necessity-of-a-cosmopolitan-outlook\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/ulrich-beck-the-necessity-of-a-cosmopolitan-outlook\/\",\"name\":\"Ulrich Beck: The necessity of a cosmopolitan outlook - European Alternatives\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/ulrich-beck-the-necessity-of-a-cosmopolitan-outlook\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/ulrich-beck-the-necessity-of-a-cosmopolitan-outlook\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-01-08T11:46:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-03-03T11:09:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/#\/schema\/person\/22a482000088767ac51a1e6286c8ad2b\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/ulrich-beck-the-necessity-of-a-cosmopolitan-outlook\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/ulrich-beck-the-necessity-of-a-cosmopolitan-outlook\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/ulrich-beck-the-necessity-of-a-cosmopolitan-outlook\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"\",\"contentUrl\":\"\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/ulrich-beck-the-necessity-of-a-cosmopolitan-outlook\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/fr\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ulrich Beck: The necessity of a cosmopolitan outlook\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/\",\"name\":\"European Alternatives\",\"description\":\"Democracy, Equality and Culture beyond the nation\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/#\/schema\/person\/22a482000088767ac51a1e6286c8ad2b\",\"name\":\"Marta Cillero\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e23f0c5351248c4771d9928f748b58d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e23f0c5351248c4771d9928f748b58d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Marta Cillero\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ulrich Beck: The necessity of a cosmopolitan outlook - European Alternatives","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/ulrich-beck-the-necessity-of-a-cosmopolitan-outlook\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ulrich Beck: The necessity of a cosmopolitan outlook - European Alternatives","og_description":"Ulrich Beck died on the 1st January 2015. As a tribute to his cosmopolitan thinking and utopianism for Europe, we here republish an interview he…","og_url":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/ulrich-beck-the-necessity-of-a-cosmopolitan-outlook\/","og_site_name":"European Alternatives","article_published_time":"2015-01-08T11:46:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-03-03T11:09:50+00:00","author":"Marta Cillero","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Marta Cillero","Est. reading time":"14 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/ulrich-beck-the-necessity-of-a-cosmopolitan-outlook\/","url":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/ulrich-beck-the-necessity-of-a-cosmopolitan-outlook\/","name":"Ulrich Beck: The necessity of a cosmopolitan outlook - European Alternatives","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/ulrich-beck-the-necessity-of-a-cosmopolitan-outlook\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/ulrich-beck-the-necessity-of-a-cosmopolitan-outlook\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"","datePublished":"2015-01-08T11:46:46+00:00","dateModified":"2020-03-03T11:09:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/#\/schema\/person\/22a482000088767ac51a1e6286c8ad2b"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/ulrich-beck-the-necessity-of-a-cosmopolitan-outlook\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/euroalter.com\/ulrich-beck-the-necessity-of-a-cosmopolitan-outlook\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/ulrich-beck-the-necessity-of-a-cosmopolitan-outlook\/#primaryimage","url":"","contentUrl":""},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/ulrich-beck-the-necessity-of-a-cosmopolitan-outlook\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/fr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ulrich Beck: The necessity of a cosmopolitan outlook"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/","name":"European Alternatives","description":"Democracy, Equality and Culture beyond the nation","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/#\/schema\/person\/22a482000088767ac51a1e6286c8ad2b","name":"Marta Cillero","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e23f0c5351248c4771d9928f748b58d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e23f0c5351248c4771d9928f748b58d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Marta Cillero"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7868","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7868"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7868\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17950,"href":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7868\/revisions\/17950"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/fr\/wp-json\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7868"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7868"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euroalter.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7868"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}